<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Economic Times Favors Buying Cheap Vs. Buying Efficient</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realmofprosperity.com/2009/06/bad-economic-times-favors-buying-cheap-vs-buying-efficient/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realmofprosperity.com/2009/06/bad-economic-times-favors-buying-cheap-vs-buying-efficient/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:01:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 208th Carnival of Personal Finance: Lobster Roll Edition &#124; Money Under 30</title>
		<link>http://www.realmofprosperity.com/2009/06/bad-economic-times-favors-buying-cheap-vs-buying-efficient/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>The 208th Carnival of Personal Finance: Lobster Roll Edition &#124; Money Under 30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realmofprosperity.com/?p=596#comment-597</guid>
		<description>[...] Realm of Prosperity: Bad Economic Times Favors Buying Cheap Vs. Buying Efficient. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Realm of Prosperity: Bad Economic Times Favors Buying Cheap Vs. Buying Efficient. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Harr @ Wealth...Uncomplicated</title>
		<link>http://www.realmofprosperity.com/2009/06/bad-economic-times-favors-buying-cheap-vs-buying-efficient/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Harr @ Wealth...Uncomplicated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realmofprosperity.com/?p=596#comment-594</guid>
		<description>While I agree that people are definitely moving more towards cheap instead of overall value, fuel efficient vehicles still lack a significant value proposition.  Until gas prices move north of $5/gallon, high tech auto will still lag behind in total value offered to the consumer.  At this point (gas prices around $3/gallon), buying a much less expensive gas powered vehicle is still a better value over hybrids.  In other words, buying new tech just doesn&#039;t add up from a direct cost analysis for consumers.  If you want to go green, then you&#039;re not going to do it for the potential savings on fuel costs, you&#039;ll do it because you&#039;re willing to pay a premium to reduce environmental impact, ego, etc.

By the way, a Ferrari historically doesn&#039;t lose it&#039;s value so if you&#039;re looking for resale value, it&#039;s better than a Prius, Civic, Camry, or just about any other gas/hybrid/whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that people are definitely moving more towards cheap instead of overall value, fuel efficient vehicles still lack a significant value proposition.  Until gas prices move north of $5/gallon, high tech auto will still lag behind in total value offered to the consumer.  At this point (gas prices around $3/gallon), buying a much less expensive gas powered vehicle is still a better value over hybrids.  In other words, buying new tech just doesn&#8217;t add up from a direct cost analysis for consumers.  If you want to go green, then you&#8217;re not going to do it for the potential savings on fuel costs, you&#8217;ll do it because you&#8217;re willing to pay a premium to reduce environmental impact, ego, etc.</p>
<p>By the way, a Ferrari historically doesn&#8217;t lose it&#8217;s value so if you&#8217;re looking for resale value, it&#8217;s better than a Prius, Civic, Camry, or just about any other gas/hybrid/whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
